<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista Sidebar? Do we love it or not?</title>
	<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/</link>
	<description>General musings and programming stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-142095</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-142095</guid>
					<description>I think that Vista sidebar don`t need for people like me...
P.S: Vista must die :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think that Vista sidebar don`t need for people like me&#8230;<br />
P.S: Vista must die <img src='http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: How to overclock your CPU</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-127136</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-127136</guid>
					<description>To me like most of Vista's features, is just more bloatware that just clogs up your computer's performance. 

I've personally turned it off becuasue most of the stuff is useless. And that clock.. tick, tick, tick. It like watching your life drain away in front of your eyes.

I kinda wish I never upgraded to Vista with me been a gamer. Should of stuck with XP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>To me like most of Vista&#8217;s features, is just more bloatware that just clogs up your computer&#8217;s performance. </p>
	<p>I&#8217;ve personally turned it off becuasue most of the stuff is useless. And that clock.. tick, tick, tick. It like watching your life drain away in front of your eyes.</p>
	<p>I kinda wish I never upgraded to Vista with me been a gamer. Should of stuck with XP
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: penis enlargement</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-101681</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-101681</guid>
					<description>If you're a blogger (or a blog reader), you're painfully familiar with people who try to raise their own websites' search engine rankings by submitting linked blog comments like &amp;#34;Visit my discount pharmaceuticals site.&amp;#34; This is called comment spam, we don't like it either, and we've been testing a new tag that blocks it. From now on, when Google sees the attribute (rel=&amp;#34;nofollow&amp;#34;) on hyperlinks, those links won't get any credit when we rank websites in our search results. This isn't a negative vote for the site where the comment was posted; it's just a way to make sure that spammers get no benefit from abusing public areas like blog comments, trackbacks, and referrer lists. http://www.gordoniihoodia.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you&#8217;re a blogger (or a blog reader), you&#8217;re painfully familiar with people who try to raise their own websites&#8217; search engine rankings by submitting linked blog comments like &quot;Visit my discount pharmaceuticals site.&quot; This is called comment spam, we don&#8217;t like it either, and we&#8217;ve been testing a new tag that blocks it. From now on, when Google sees the attribute (rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;) on hyperlinks, those links won&#8217;t get any credit when we rank websites in our search results. This isn&#8217;t a negative vote for the site where the comment was posted; it&#8217;s just a way to make sure that spammers get no benefit from abusing public areas like blog comments, trackbacks, and referrer lists. <a href='http://www.gordoniihoodia.net'>http://www.gordoniihoodia.net</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76757</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76757</guid>
					<description>Hi Phyrewall - that's a very good hint. It's not perfect, as it seems to cycle through all the gadgets (including those that are still on the Sidebar), so it takes quite a few keystrokes to find the one I want. But it seems to be the only way to get to those undocked gadgets, so it's certainly very good to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Phyrewall - that&#8217;s a very good hint. It&#8217;s not perfect, as it seems to cycle through all the gadgets (including those that are still on the Sidebar), so it takes quite a few keystrokes to find the one I want. But it seems to be the only way to get to those undocked gadgets, so it&#8217;s certainly very good to know.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phyrewall</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76673</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76673</guid>
					<description>You can use WinKey+G to see a gadget that's on the desktop without minimizing all windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You can use WinKey+G to see a gadget that&#8217;s on the desktop without minimizing all windows.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76005</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76005</guid>
					<description>Very old, but here's a photo of my setup - I wasn't using the monitors vertically at the time, today I have the left one and the middle one rotated, while the right one is still in &amp;#34;normal&amp;#34; orientation.

http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/26/five-headed-desktop/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Very old, but here&#8217;s a photo of my setup - I wasn&#8217;t using the monitors vertically at the time, today I have the left one and the middle one rotated, while the right one is still in &quot;normal&quot; orientation.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/26/five-headed-desktop/'>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/26/five-headed-desktop/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alain</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76004</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/02/21/vista-sidebar-do-we-love-it-or-not/#comment-76004</guid>
					<description>How do you use 3 monitors?, some photos about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How do you use 3 monitors?, some photos about?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
