<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogJet v2 - mixed results</title>
	<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/</link>
	<description>General musings and programming stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-73786</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-73786</guid>
					<description>Hi Dmitry,
Sure it should! The point was that the initial version 2 could have included those requests already, as they were made a very long time ago. 
Otherwise, I don't regard this post as &amp;#34;feedback&amp;#34; - I'm rather busy right now, but as soon as I can I'll dig up those emails I exchanged with you in the past and see how the issues apply to version 2. Meanwhile, maybe you can find them in your own email archives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Dmitry,<br />
Sure it should! The point was that the initial version 2 could have included those requests already, as they were made a very long time ago.<br />
Otherwise, I don&#8217;t regard this post as &quot;feedback&quot; - I&#8217;m rather busy right now, but as soon as I can I&#8217;ll dig up those emails I exchanged with you in the past and see how the issues apply to version 2. Meanwhile, maybe you can find them in your own email archives?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dmitry Chestnykh</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-73205</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-73205</guid>
					<description>Oliver, thanks for your feedback! We have a pretty long list of features to implement in the future versions, which, of course, should include your requests as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oliver, thanks for your feedback! We have a pretty long list of features to implement in the future versions, which, of course, should include your requests as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-71563</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-71563</guid>
					<description>I don't quite agree... I could just as easily say it's a shame that a company like Microsoft throws its weight around in such a small market and basically eliminates it in a single blow. In the end, other companies have the matter in their own hands - I'm using a paid packing tool (PowerArchiver) for instance, because its functionality surpasses that of the standard thing in Windows, and Microsoft has never done much to go into that market with more force. Same for CD/DVD burning software.

I would certainly like to see a &amp;#34;professional&amp;#34; blog tool in the market and I'm willing to pay money for it. But of course it'll have to have the same functionality as the free thing (which I think it basically does), and it would be even better if it had some more, specifically those custom functions that Microsoft normally doesn't look out for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t quite agree&#8230; I could just as easily say it&#8217;s a shame that a company like Microsoft throws its weight around in such a small market and basically eliminates it in a single blow. In the end, other companies have the matter in their own hands - I&#8217;m using a paid packing tool (PowerArchiver) for instance, because its functionality surpasses that of the standard thing in Windows, and Microsoft has never done much to go into that market with more force. Same for CD/DVD burning software.</p>
	<p>I would certainly like to see a &quot;professional&quot; blog tool in the market and I&#8217;m willing to pay money for it. But of course it&#8217;ll have to have the same functionality as the free thing (which I think it basically does), and it would be even better if it had some more, specifically those custom functions that Microsoft normally doesn&#8217;t look out for.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Kaschimer</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-71562</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2007/01/30/blogjet-v2-mixed-results/#comment-71562</guid>
					<description>It's a shame that companies are still charging for blogging apps like BlogJet when free tools exist that look and work just as good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s a shame that companies are still charging for blogging apps like BlogJet when free tools exist that look and work just as good&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
