<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VS 2005 Image Library (the facts)</title>
	<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/</link>
	<description>General musings and programming stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rick Strahl</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/#comment-286</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 09:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/#comment-286</guid>
					<description>I'd say that's a a very subjective statement. 16x16 maybe small but if you 
want more objective toolbars i that size actually works fine if you use it
in combination with text on your tool buttons. As you say most apps don't have
1000 icons like Office apps or VS, so the toolbar should have room for text
and hotkeys...

BTW, you might want to fix the textbox in the comment box here. The thing goes off into nothing on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s a a very subjective statement. 16&#215;16 maybe small but if you<br />
want more objective toolbars i that size actually works fine if you use it<br />
in combination with text on your tool buttons. As you say most apps don&#8217;t have<br />
1000 icons like Office apps or VS, so the toolbar should have room for text<br />
and hotkeys&#8230;</p>
	<p>BTW, you might want to fix the textbox in the comment box here. The thing goes off into nothing on the left.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/#comment-119</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/#comment-119</guid>
					<description>I do think it's a good idea for them to do it. But the reason why many people have been asking for this for a long time was that the images that came with VS weren't fit for any practical task. I don't see anything has changed with the new library in that regard, so I think they might just as well not have bothered at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I do think it&#8217;s a good idea for them to do it. But the reason why many people have been asking for this for a long time was that the images that came with VS weren&#8217;t fit for any practical task. I don&#8217;t see anything has changed with the new library in that regard, so I think they might just as well not have bothered at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: colin harman</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/#comment-118</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/04/21/vs2005-imagelib/#comment-118</guid>
					<description>i havnt seen the library of images yet, but i did see the film 
to today, i personally think its good they released these icons
cos like you said microsoft arnt a graphics componany :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i havnt seen the library of images yet, but i did see the film<br />
to today, i personally think its good they released these icons<br />
cos like you said microsoft arnt a graphics componany <img src='http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
