Comments on: Improving XPO scalability with ASP.NET http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/ General musings and programming stuff Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:51:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: youtube http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-136228 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:06:00 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-136228 forever asp.net :) forever asp.net :)

]]> by: devonwright http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-129240 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:23:22 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-129240 how would the multiple sessions be handled if they from a database like mysql? how would the multiple sessions be handled if they from a database like mysql?

]]> by: Oliver Sturm http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-16395 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:07:49 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-16395 This stuff has all changed very much in the newest XPO release... you should have a look at some allround explanations in <a href="http://community.devexpress.com/blogs/xpo/archive/2006/03/27/11.aspx">this post</a> to <a href="http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2006/04/07/developer-express-community-and-blog-site-available-xpo-articles/">the new DX community blog</a> and also at <a href="http://www.devexpress.com/Support/Newsgroups.xml">the newsgroups</a>, where a lot of this stuff has been discussed since <a href="http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2006/03/16/new-version-of-xpo-released-objectrelational-mapping-made-really-easy/">the release of XPO 6.1</a>. This stuff has all changed very much in the newest XPO release… you should have a look at some allround explanations in this post to the new DX community blog and also at the newsgroups, where a lot of this stuff has been discussed since the release of XPO 6.1.

]]> by: kmi http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-16394 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:02:46 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-16394 can you send a example which use multiple session? thanks a lot can you send a example which use multiple session? thanks a lot

]]> by: hhs http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-4481 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:04:41 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-4481 thanks your blog. can you send a Sample for me ? i just now use xpo+asp.net+csharp,need help .in that way ,I was very lucky. thanks your blog. can you send a Sample for me ? i just now use xpo+asp.net+csharp,need help .in that way ,I was very lucky.

]]> by: Beginning Programming http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-4477 Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:34:10 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-4477 <strong>XPO ASP.net -- Appstudio</strong> XPO ASP.net — Appstudio

]]> by: Oliver Sturm http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-418 Mon, 23 May 2005 08:56:03 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-418 Sure, this can happen as long as you don't break the "1 Session = 1 DB Connection" paradigm. It's obviously a good idea to restrict the lifetime of an XPO session on the ASP.NET level, but if there's a lot of concurrency the connection might still run empty very quickly. Sure, this can happen as long as you don’t break the “1 Session = 1 DB Connection” paradigm. It’s obviously a good idea to restrict the lifetime of an XPO session on the ASP.NET level, but if there’s a lot of concurrency the connection might still run empty very quickly.

]]> by: Josh http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-416 Sun, 22 May 2005 03:39:24 +0000 http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/03/08/xpo-aspnet/#comment-416 Interesting thought. I too am using XPO as my persistence layer in an ASP.NET application. I've had a few problems with running out of connections in the connection pool, and I'm was wondering if it had something to do with XPO keeping ahold of the connections too long. I am using sort of a pattern that keeps an XPO session in the ASP.NET cache for a small amount of time (allows only for 2 minutes of inactivity) and is kept unique per connected user (similar to having an it in a session with a 2 minute timeout) I am going to try forcing XPO to close the connection when it is done with it, and see if that fixes the problem. BTW, have you noticed any problems like I am describing (XPO hogging up the connection pool)? Thanks... good blog. Interesting thought. I too am using XPO as my persistence layer in an ASP.NET application. I’ve had a few problems
with running out of connections in the connection pool, and I’m was wondering if it had something to do with XPO keeping
ahold of the connections too long. I am using sort of a pattern that keeps an XPO session in the ASP.NET cache for a
small amount of time (allows only for 2 minutes of inactivity) and is kept unique per connected user (similar to having an
it in a session with a 2 minute timeout) I am going to try forcing XPO to close the connection when it is done with it,
and see if that fixes the problem. BTW, have you noticed any problems like I am describing (XPO hogging up the connection pool)?

Thanks… good blog.

]]>