<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weird Windows looks</title>
	<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/</link>
	<description>General musings and programming stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-32</guid>
					<description>Oh well, it's a matter of taste, of course. I happen to like the Fisher Price theme somehow... at least after getting used to it over the years. Let's call this an advanced example of the flexibility of the Windows window manager :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh well, it&#8217;s a matter of taste, of course. I happen to like the Fisher Price theme somehow&#8230; at least after getting used to it over the years. Let&#8217;s call this an advanced example of the flexibility of the Windows window manager <img src='http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-30</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-30</guid>
					<description>That's actually an improvement over the default Fisher-Price theme that ships with Windows XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That&#8217;s actually an improvement over the default Fisher-Price theme that ships with Windows XP.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-29</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-29</guid>
					<description>I find that surprisingly many people like to work with a colour-on-black setup in their editor windows. While that somehow made sense in DOS times because the whole screen would have been glaring white otherwise, it's not too useful in Windows, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I find that surprisingly many people like to work with a colour-on-black setup in their editor windows. While that somehow made sense in DOS times because the whole screen would have been glaring white otherwise, it&#8217;s not too useful in Windows, IMO.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Barone</title>
		<link>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/archives/2005/02/28/weird-windows-looks/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>Gosh, it sure it a bit off the standard setup, isn't it...

Kind of took me back at least a decade or so to some old DOS boxes I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gosh, it sure it a bit off the standard setup, isn&#8217;t it&#8230;</p>
	<p>Kind of took me back at least a decade or so to some old DOS boxes I had.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
