http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:45:23 +0000 Oliver Sturm [Member] c249815@http://www.sodthis.com/b2evolution/ Hi Steven,<br /> <br /> Yeah, I believe that - but I haven't checked it. I lost interest in the exact reason when I saw that the behavior depends on a few lines of entirely unconnected code. I don't expect this to be intended behavior anymore. Will keep this blog posted when I find out more.<br />
Yeah, I believe that - but I haven't checked it. I lost interest in the exact reason when I saw that the behavior depends on a few lines of entirely unconnected code. I don't expect this to be intended behavior anymore. Will keep this blog posted when I find out more.
]]> http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/2010/02/16/more-odd-behavior-dynamicobject-this-tim#c249815 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:38:25 +0000 Steven [Visitor] c249814@http://www.sodthis.com/b2evolution/ Have you looked at the generated IL. I bet you find the answer there. I expect that the DoFall method wraps your MyDynamicType in a dynamic object. http://www.sturmnet.org/blog/2010/02/16/more-odd-behavior-dynamicobject-this-tim#c249814